Archive for the ‘Nutrition’ category

Your Fat is Making You Fatter!

July 1st, 2010

Hormones actions in the body interest me and I spend a fair amount of time researching their physiological impact.  I am not a regular reader of the Huffington Post, but a few months ago I stumbled across an interesting article by Dr. Kent Holtorf, an expert on endocrinology (hormones).  This article talks about a different angle on the struggle with weight loss.  So for those of you that are exercising and eating well, but can’t seem to shed the pounds than read on…it may be your hormones sabotaging you!  

One parting thought (or caveat) to remember…hormones or genes may be involved with your weight gain, but the biggest impact is what you put on your plate!!

Long Term Weight Loss – More Than Will Power?

by Kent Holtorf Medical Director, Holtorf Medical Group

Obesity has become a major health epidemic and has dramatically increased over the last decades. Studies show that approximately one-third of the U.S. population is classified as obese and over two-thirds are significantly overweight. While the cause is multifactorial, studies are clear that almost all overweight individuals have metabolic and endocrinological dysfunction that is causing or contributing to their inability to lose weight.

It is not simply a problem that individuals are taking in more calories than they are consuming or lack of exercise or willpower, but rather it is a complex vicious-cycle of endocrinological and metabolic dysfunction. Contemporary medicine has failed to address these dysfunctions in overweight individuals and doctors and patients continue to believe that all cases are a matter of willpower and lifestyle. Thus, it is no surprise that obesity is reaching epidemic proportions.

Research is demonstrating that dysregulation of two key hormones may be a cause or major contributor of weight gain or inability to lose weight in the majority of overweight people. The first is leptin and the second is reverse T3. The exciting part is that doctors can now test for the presence of these physiologic barriers to weight loss and prescribe appropriate treatments with potentially dramatic results.

Leptin

The hormone leptin has been found to be a major regulator of body weight and metabolism. The body secretes leptin as weight is gained to signal the brain (specifically the hypo¬thalamus) that there are adequate energy (fat) stores. The hypothalamus should then stimulate metabolic processes that result in weight loss, including a reduction in hunger, an increased satiety with eating, an increase in resting metabolism and an increase in lipolysis (fat breakdown). New research has found that this leptin signaling is dysfunctional in the majority of people who have difficultly losing weight or are unable to lose weight.

The problem is not in the production of leptin, but rather, studies show that the majority of overweight individuals who are having difficulty losing weight have a leptin resistance, where the leptin is unable to produce its normal effects to stimulate weight loss. This leptin resistance is sensed as starvation, so multiple mechanisms are activated to increase fat stores, rather than burn excess fat stores. Leptin resistance also stimulates the formation of reverse T3, which blocks the effects of thyroid hormone on metabolism (discussed below).

Testing: A leptin level can be ordered by your physician. If greater than 10, it demonstrates there is a degree of leptin resistance contributing to an inability to lose weight. The higher the number the more significant the leptin resistance.

Treatment: There are currently two medications are shown to be able to treat leptin resistance and can result in significant weight loss. One is Symlin and the other is Byetta. These are currently approved for the treatment of diabetes but can be prescribed “off-label” for the treatment of leptin resistance. They are showing significant promise in the non-diabetic population with the ability to produce dramatic weight loss in a large percentage of overweight patients. The amount of weight loss varies according to the study design, but a significant percent of patients are experiencing weight loss, despite little or no change in diet.

The leptin resistance is not permanent and is shown to improve with weight loss so diet and exercise can be beneficial. The “catch-22″ is, however, that it is difficult to lose weight with leptin resistance. High carbohydrate diets and in particular high-fructose corn syrup is shown to significantly increase leptin resistance and is a likely mechanism that high fructose corn syrup is associated with obesity, especially in children. Avoidance of high fructose corn syrup and carbohydrates would be recommended for those with high leptin levels.

Reverse T3

It is well known that thyroid hormones regulate metabolism and that low thyroid hormone production (hypothyroidism) causes low metabolism, but it has only recently been understood that thyroid production can be fine but there can a problem of activation of the hormones inside the cells that can be a major cause of low metabolism.

The thyroid gland secretes an inactive thyroid hormone called thyroxine, also known as T4. This is regulated by thyroid stimulation hormone (TSH) produced by the brain (specifically the pituitary). Normally, the inactive T4 is converted inside the cell to the active thyroid hormone called triiodothyronine (also known as T3). Most doctors will check TSH and T4 levels to see if thyroid levels are normal.

The studies are showing that it is not the production of thyroid that is the problem, but rather it is problem inside the cell that the inactive T4 is not converted to T3 but rather to a mirror image of T3 called reverse T3. The reverse T3 has the opposite effect of T3, blocking the effects of T3 and lowering rather than increasing metabolism.

It is an evolutionary fall-back that was useful in times of famine or in hibernating animals to lower metabolism. Studies are showing that stress and dieting (especially yo-yo dieting) can set this hormone into action as well as chronic illness such as diabetes, chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia.

The production of reverse T3 is found to be a major method by which the body ‘tries” to regain any lost weight with dieting. As soon as the body senses a reduction in calories, the production of reverse T3 is stimulated to lower metabolism. With chronic dieting or stress, the body often stays in this “starvation mode” with elevated levels of reverse T3 and decreased levels of T3, which is a major reason for the regaining of lost weight with dieting as well being the mechanism behind stress induced weight gain (it is not due to increased cortisol).

Testing: There has been a long held belief by endocrinologists and other physicians that adequate thyroid levels can be determined by testing the TSH and T4 levels. Studies are showing that such standard testing will miss 80% of thyroid dysfunction so most endocrinologists and other doctors will tell their patients that their thyroid is fine based on this usual testing. The doctors must run a free T3/reverse T3 ratio. Generally, a healthy person will have a ratio greater than 2 so a person with a ratio less than 2 should also be considered a candidate for thyroid supplementation. Many endocrinologist and physicians are not yet aware of the significance or ability to run this ratio so it may take some searching.

Treatment: The standard treatment of hypothyroidism involves the supplementation with T4, including Synthroid and Levoxyl. These are not effective to remedy such a situation because the problem is not the amount of T4 but rather the excess conversion of T4 to reverse T3, blocking effects of the active T3. One must bypass the abnormality by supplementing with physiologic doses of T3, not T4 (preferably timed released T3). It is not appropriate to give thyroid hormone for weight loss, but rather to correct an abnormality diagnosed by appropriate blood tests.

In summary, emerging evidence demonstrates that a significant number of overweight patients have a metabolic problem rather than a problem of willpower or lifestyle. Identification and correction of these metabolic abnormalities, including leptin resistance and cellular thyroid dysfunction, can result in dramatic long term successful weight loss.

Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kent-holtorf/long-term-weight-loss—m_b_192933.html&cp

  • Share/Bookmark

Time to Go Nuts!

June 1st, 2010

The results of a meta-analysis published in the May issue of Archives of Internal Medicine found that consuming nuts of nearly any type improves blood lipid levels, lowers total- and LDL-cholesterol levels, and improves important lipid ratios.  (Click here for the PubMed abstract)

“Our findings confirm the results of epidemiological studies showing that nut consumption lowers coronary heart disease risk and support the inclusion of nuts in therapeutic dietary interventions for improving blood lipid levels and lipoproteins and for lowering coronary heart disease risk,” write lead investigator Dr Joan Sabaté from Loma Linda University, CA (a sister school to my alma mater).

Men and women experienced similar effect from consuming nuts.  The benefit was observed regardless of the specific nut consumed and regardless of the study funding source. The risk of coronary heart disease was nearly 40% lower among those who ate four or more servings of nuts per week versus those who rarely ate nuts. 

In the paper, Sabaté and colleagues note that estimated reductions in the pooled analysis are similar to those of a recent meta-analysis of pooled walnut consumption studies. “The similarity of the results obtained by different methodologic approaches confirms the validity of our findings,” they write. The results, according to the group, confirm that increasing the consumption of nuts as part of an “otherwise prudent diet can be expected to favorably affect blood lipid levels (at least in the short term) and have the potential to lower coronary heart disease risk.”

Remeber to eat this…

Not this…

  • Share/Bookmark

Protease, The Immune Booster, Part I

March 18th, 2010

I have previously posted on the benefits of enzymes and now I want to share a little info on protease.  Proteolytic enzymes make up the most widely researched category of enzymes and are often called protease.  When proteolytic enzymes are consumed with food, they assist in breaking down proteins.  When consumed between meals, they are absorbed into the blood to assist with immune imbalances, heavy metal toxicity, inflammatory conditions, circulatory disorders, skin problems, constipation, water retention, inappropriate blood clots, heart disease, stroke, and cancer.  The use of protease for these conditions is the second most popular use of enzyme therapy, after digestive applications. 

One thing to note is the cause of illnesses and the relationship to protein.  For example, cancer cells are surrounded by a protein coat; blood clots that cause stroke and a high percentage of heart attacks are made up of a protein called fibrin; pathogenic bacteria and parasites are comprised of proteins; fungal forms such as Candida are made up of a protein nucleus surrounded by a chitin shell.  Viruses are enveloped by protein.  In order for us to stay healthy we need to be well equipped to overcome protein invaders in the body that will make us ill if left unchecked.

Here’s a surprise…we are well equipped. To quote Dr. Ellen Cutler, M.D.:

Our immune system is overbuilt for success

Unfortunately, we can make it under-equipped by overeating cooked and processed foods.  Since digestion always takes the highest precedence, our body will sacrifice energy utilized for immune function to digest the foods we have eaten.  If those foods are devoid of enzymes, a greater need arises.  After years of repeating this pattern, the body can no longer keep up; a shortage then occurs, which eventually takes its toll. 

A protease deficiency allows bacteria, viruses, and all other pathogenic processes to have there way with our bodies.  Therefore, the last thing we want is a protease deficiency.

Stay tune for Part 2 to learn how Protease aides the immune system by joining with alpha II-macroglobulin to keep us healthy…

  • Share/Bookmark

Start Making Small Changes!

March 1st, 2010

London, UK - The US must focus on simple things to improve outcomes for heart disease—such as encouraging lifestyle changes and good control of hypertension—rather than just concentrating on grand technological gestures and drug use, a new editorial in the Lancet concludes [1].

The editorial comments on two new reports [2,3], the first of which, from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), consists of 572 pages and shows that—despite an age-adjusted decline in mortality from heart disease of 41% between 1990 and 2007—heart disease remains the leading cause of death in the US. In 2006, almost 650 000 Americans died from heart disease, it states.

The second report, from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) and featured by heartwire earlier this week, specifically addresses hypertension and calls for better management of high blood pressure in the US.

Also increasing exponentially is the prescription of drugs, with use of statins increasing almost 10-fold, from 2% in 1988-1994 to 22% in 2003-2006 in people aged 45 or older, and use of antidiabetic drugs in the same age group rising by about 50%.

“Although blood cholesterol concentrations have been dropping, [the report] also shows that a pharmacological approach alone is not enough to control and manage the escalating burden of heart disease in the USA,” the Lancet editorial comments.

Lifestyle risk factors are neglected in the US, it adds, where 22% of men and 17% of women still smoke, a third of adults are classified as obese, and less than a third of the population engages in regular leisure-time physical activity.

And hypertension is another example of “an easily preventable, simple-to-diagnose, and inexpensive-to-treat disorder related to heart disease.” Yet nearly one-third of the US population (73 million adults) is currently hypertensive, and one in six adults there dies from hypertension-related complications, as detailed in the IOM report, the editorial says.

“Chronic heart disease places an unnecessary burden on the American people and the US healthcare system. Strategic resource reallocation directed at local communities can reach a large number of individuals to provide substantial improvements in population well-being. Small changes can make big differences,” the editorial concludes.

My Suggestion:

Cut out the extra sugar in your diet!  Added sugars are an integral part of the American diet today. We are on a sugar binge. Sugar consumption is 22 to 30 teaspoons per person, per day. Our hedonism packs on 350 to 480 worthless calories that we cannot afford.

The heart association’s new recommendations are 100 calories a day (about 6 1/2 level teaspoons) of added sugars for women and 150 calories (9+ level teaspoons) for men.

Sources

  1. State of the heart in the USA. Lancet 2010; 375:697.
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Health, United States, 2009. February 17, 2010. Available here.
  3. Institute of Medicine. A Population-Based Policy and Systems Change Approach to Prevent and Control Hypertension. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010. Available at here.
  • Share/Bookmark

My Soy Dilemma, Part 1

February 22nd, 2010

I am struggling with a choice that my wife and I have been making for the past couple months.  My seven month old daughter weaned herself last month and now is solely consuming formula.  The dilemma comes from my daughter having a dairy intolerance and so we have been giving her a soy based formula.  This tells you which side of the fence I am on, but I am still wrestling with the choice.  The pro soy side talks about the heart health, cholesterol lowering, anti-cancer benefits of soy.  The con side talks of soy depressing thyroid function, hormone impact (male fertility), and causing cancer.  So over the next few weeks I will share a series of posts that has led me to my decision to give my daughter a soy based formula.  However, I am open to discussion on what is best, so with your input and comments I am willing to re-evaluate my position. 

Here is what we know… 

Soybeans provide a complete protein that calorie for calorie has twice the protein as red meat and ten times the protein as whole milk.  Soybeans contain EFAs in the form of omega-3s, iron, calcium, phosphorous and a good source of B vitamins. 

Cultures have subsisted on soy for generations without ill effects.  The studies that show negative effects from soy are largely conducted on animals which does not always translate to humans (think Thalidomide, Phen-Phen, and Opren for examples).  However, those cultures did not eat the amounts of soy that we currently eat or in the processed forms we consume.  The change from soybeans, tofu, tempeh, and miso to soy “meats, cheeses, ice creams” and soybean oil in processed foods.  This is overlaid with genetically modified soy, thank you Monsanto (typed sarcastically).  We also can not ignore the pesky phytoestrogens and isoflavones in soy which have been called estrogen mimickers because they are structurally similar.

A little bit of doubt…   

Is there a problem then if we only eat organically grown soy?  I am not convinced, but reading Dr. Mike Fitzpatrick’s, an environmental scientist, work has me doubting my decision.  Here is a quote from Dr. Mercola commenting on a study by Dr. Fitzpatrick:

Folks, soy formula is one of the worst foods that you could feed your child. Not only does it have profoundly adverse hormonal effects as discussed above, but it also has over 1000% more aluminum than conventional milk based formulas. 

Let me know which side of the soy controversy you are…pro- or con- and why.

To be continued…

  • Share/Bookmark